Federal Reserve’s ScamClassifier Model: A New Framework for Fighting Scams

Image

As scams continue to evolve and grow in sophistication, the need for a structured and consistent method to identify and categorise them has become critical. The ScamClassifierˢᵐ Model , developed by the Federal Reserve-led Scams Definition and Classification Work Group , offers a voluntary classification framework designed to improve scam detection, reporting, and mitigation across industries. This model was developed to address the growing complexity of scams and to provide a standardised approach for all stakeholders involved in combating fraud.

Overview of the ScamClassifier Model

The ScamClassifier Model provides a comprehensive framework for classifying various types of scams, defined as "the use of deception or manipulation intended to achieve financial gain." The model categorises scams using a structured series of steps, ensuring that fraud is accurately identified and labelled, including the ability to capture attempted scams.

Image

The Four-Step Process

  1. Confirm the Scam : The first step is to determine whether the case meets the official definition of a scam, which involves the use of deception or manipulation for financial gain.

  2. Authorised or Unauthorised Payment : Next, the model assesses whether the payment was authorised or unauthorised, which helps in understanding the scam dynamics.

  3. Identify the Scam Category : This step involves analysing how the scam was executed—whether through deceit, impersonation, or other manipulative tactics.

  4. Select the Scam Type : Based on the scam's characteristics, it is classified into one of nine categories:

    1. Merchandise

    2. Investment

    3. Property Sale or Rental

    4. Romance Impostor

    5. Government Impostor

    6. Bank Impostor

    7. Business Impostor

    8. Relative/Family/Friend

    9. Other Trusted Party

By using this structured process, organisations can classify scams accurately, leading to better reporting and enhanced collaboration across institutions.

Benefits of the ScamClassifier Model

The ScamClassifier model  provides several key advantages for organisations looking to improve their scam prevention and mitigation strategies:

  • Improved Scam Detection : With a clear framework in place, organisations can more quickly identify the type of scam they are dealing with, enabling faster and more effective responses.

  • Enhanced Reporting : The consistent classification helps organisations align their reporting methods, making data sharing and analysis more streamlined across different industries and sectors.

  • Scalability and Flexibility : As scams evolve, the ScamClassifier model is adaptable to new scam types, ensuring that it remains a relevant tool in the fight against fraud.

How the ScamClassifier Model Supports the Fight Against Scams

The ScamClassifier model provides a unified language for identifying scams, making it easier for institutions to share data and collaborate. This standardisation reduces the fragmentation often found in fraud reporting and helps identify trends and emerging threats more effectively. By adopting this model, institutions can ensure a more robust approach to scam prevention, benefiting both consumers and businesses.

How the ScamClassifier and FraudClassifier Models Work Together

In addition to the ScamClassifier model, the FraudClassifierˢᵐ  model  offers a broader framework for understanding fraud  involving unauthorised payments, while the ScamClassifier focuses on scams involving authorised payments made through deception.

Image

Typically, the FraudClassifier is applied first to determine if an incident involves unauthorised payments. It classifies these incidents based on how the unauthorised party accessed payment information, helping organisations address fraud at a systemic level.

If the payment is found to be authorised, meaning the victim was deceived into making it, the ScamClassifier steps in to categorise the specific type of scam (e.g., impersonation, romance, business scams). Together, these models provide a complete view of fraudulent activities, allowing organisations to improve their fraud detection and prevention strategies.

Conclusion

The ScamClassifierˢᵐ model is a significant development in the fight against fraud, offering a structured, scalable approach to classifying and addressing the wide array of scams that target consumers and businesses today. By encouraging the use of a consistent scam classification framework, this model enables organisations to improve their scam detection and prevention strategies, while also promoting better data sharing and collaboration.

For more information about the ScamClassifier model, visit the Federal Reserve's ScamClassifier page .

There will be a panel discussion on the ScamClassifier model at the Global Anti-Scam Summit Americas 2024 , where experts will explore its real-world application and impact.

About the Author

James Greening , operating under a pseudonym, brings a wealth of experience to his role. Formerly the sole driving force behind Fake Website Buster, James leverages his expertise to raise awareness about online scams. He currently serves as a Content Marketing & Design Specialist for the Global Anti-Scam Alliance (GASA), and contributes to ScamAdviser.com .

James’s mission aligns with GASA’s mission to protect consumers worldwide from scams. He is committed to empowering professionals with the insights and tools necessary to detect and mitigate online scams, ensuring the security and integrity of their operations and digital ecosystems.

Connect with James Greening on LinkedIn

Oct 17, 2024
5 minute read
Category
Best Practices Topic - Data Sharing Industry - Financial Authorities
Written by
Global Anti-Scam Alliance (GASA)
Global Anti-Scam Alliance (GASA)
Share article

Latest blogs & research

How Amazon Uses AI to Help Consumers Verify Suspicious Messages

How Amazon Is Helping Consumers Verify Messages and Avoid Impersonation Scams

Explore how Amazon uses AI and outgoing communication records to verify suspicious messages and inform approaches to impersonation scam prevention.

Best Practices Topic - Scam Reporting Region - Global Topic - Scam Detection
state of scams in hong kong 2026

Whoscall, GASA and Mastercard Release the 2026 Asia Scam Report: Hong Kong

More Than 80% of Hong Kong Respondents Encountered Scams; Phone Calls and SMS Remain the Leading Channels

Research Scam Trends Topic - Fraud Research Region - Asia-Pacific
State of Scams in Asia - 2026 Report

71% of Adults Surveyed Across 13 Asian Markets Encountered Scams, with Estimated Losses of US$136.5 Billion

This study of 17,460 adults across 13 Asian markets shows that scam exposure is widespread, with 71% of participants encountering a scam in the past year. While 66% say they are confident in recognizing scams, 62% of those exposed went on to interact with a scammer. Ultimately, 9% lost money or personal information that led to financial loss, while only 4% reported a scam to the authorities. The findings highlight a significant gap between perceived scam awareness and real-world resilience.

Report News Scam Trends Topic - Fraud Research
3 Ways to Prevent Cross-Border Payment Scams in Mexico

3 Ways to Prevent Cross-Border Payment Scams in Mexico

Learn three ways financial institutions can prevent cross-border payment scams in Mexico through intelligence sharing, payee transparency and real-time analysis.

Best Practices Scam Trends Topic - Fraud Research Industry - Financial Authorities
GASA Africa Chapter & Google South Africa Trust & Safety Workshop

Accra Trust & Safety Workshop Turns Collaboration into Action Against Scams and Fraud in West Africa

GASA Africa Chapter and Google South Africa brought anti-fraud leaders together to strengthen cross-border cooperation and scam prevention.

News Topic - Fraud Prevention Topic - Data Sharing Topic - Scam Detection
State of Scams in Nigeria 2026: A Comparative Review Across Africa

State of Scams in Nigeria 2026: A Comparative Review Across Africa

Nigerian experts examine scam trends, technology, consumer protection and the need for stronger cross-sector collaboration.

Research Best Practices Industry - National Cyber Security Centers (NCSCs) Topic - Scam Reporting
State of Scams in Denmark - 2026 Report

Nearly three in four Danish adults encountered scams as estimated losses reach DKK 10.1 billion

New State of Scams Denmark 2026 report finds scam exposure is rising, while victims face repeated financial and emotional harm.

Research Region - Europe Scam Trends Topic - Fraud Research
State of Scams in the Philippines - 2026 Report

Building a More Trusted Digital Philippines: New Report Underscores the Need for Collective Action as Scam Exposure Continues to Rise

GASA’s State of Scams in the Philippines 2026 Report, in collaboration with Mastercard and Gogolook, highlights the growing scale of the scam challenge in the Philippines.

Research Scam Trends Topic - Fraud Research Industry - Financial Authorities