Federal Reserve’s ScamClassifier Model: A New Framework for Fighting Scams

Image

As scams continue to evolve and grow in sophistication, the need for a structured and consistent method to identify and categorise them has become critical. The ScamClassifierˢᵐ Model , developed by the Federal Reserve-led Scams Definition and Classification Work Group , offers a voluntary classification framework designed to improve scam detection, reporting, and mitigation across industries. This model was developed to address the growing complexity of scams and to provide a standardised approach for all stakeholders involved in combating fraud.

Overview of the ScamClassifier Model

The ScamClassifier Model provides a comprehensive framework for classifying various types of scams, defined as "the use of deception or manipulation intended to achieve financial gain." The model categorises scams using a structured series of steps, ensuring that fraud is accurately identified and labelled, including the ability to capture attempted scams.

Image

The Four-Step Process

  1. Confirm the Scam : The first step is to determine whether the case meets the official definition of a scam, which involves the use of deception or manipulation for financial gain.

  2. Authorised or Unauthorised Payment : Next, the model assesses whether the payment was authorised or unauthorised, which helps in understanding the scam dynamics.

  3. Identify the Scam Category : This step involves analysing how the scam was executed—whether through deceit, impersonation, or other manipulative tactics.

  4. Select the Scam Type : Based on the scam's characteristics, it is classified into one of nine categories:

    1. Merchandise

    2. Investment

    3. Property Sale or Rental

    4. Romance Impostor

    5. Government Impostor

    6. Bank Impostor

    7. Business Impostor

    8. Relative/Family/Friend

    9. Other Trusted Party

By using this structured process, organisations can classify scams accurately, leading to better reporting and enhanced collaboration across institutions.

Benefits of the ScamClassifier Model

The ScamClassifier model  provides several key advantages for organisations looking to improve their scam prevention and mitigation strategies:

  • Improved Scam Detection : With a clear framework in place, organisations can more quickly identify the type of scam they are dealing with, enabling faster and more effective responses.

  • Enhanced Reporting : The consistent classification helps organisations align their reporting methods, making data sharing and analysis more streamlined across different industries and sectors.

  • Scalability and Flexibility : As scams evolve, the ScamClassifier model is adaptable to new scam types, ensuring that it remains a relevant tool in the fight against fraud.

How the ScamClassifier Model Supports the Fight Against Scams

The ScamClassifier model provides a unified language for identifying scams, making it easier for institutions to share data and collaborate. This standardisation reduces the fragmentation often found in fraud reporting and helps identify trends and emerging threats more effectively. By adopting this model, institutions can ensure a more robust approach to scam prevention, benefiting both consumers and businesses.

How the ScamClassifier and FraudClassifier Models Work Together

In addition to the ScamClassifier model, the FraudClassifierˢᵐ  model  offers a broader framework for understanding fraud  involving unauthorised payments, while the ScamClassifier focuses on scams involving authorised payments made through deception.

Image

Typically, the FraudClassifier is applied first to determine if an incident involves unauthorised payments. It classifies these incidents based on how the unauthorised party accessed payment information, helping organisations address fraud at a systemic level.

If the payment is found to be authorised, meaning the victim was deceived into making it, the ScamClassifier steps in to categorise the specific type of scam (e.g., impersonation, romance, business scams). Together, these models provide a complete view of fraudulent activities, allowing organisations to improve their fraud detection and prevention strategies.

Conclusion

The ScamClassifierˢᵐ model is a significant development in the fight against fraud, offering a structured, scalable approach to classifying and addressing the wide array of scams that target consumers and businesses today. By encouraging the use of a consistent scam classification framework, this model enables organisations to improve their scam detection and prevention strategies, while also promoting better data sharing and collaboration.

For more information about the ScamClassifier model, visit the Federal Reserve's ScamClassifier page .

There will be a panel discussion on the ScamClassifier model at the Global Anti-Scam Summit Americas 2024 , where experts will explore its real-world application and impact.

About the Author

James Greening , operating under a pseudonym, brings a wealth of experience to his role. Formerly the sole driving force behind Fake Website Buster, James leverages his expertise to raise awareness about online scams. He currently serves as a Content Marketing & Design Specialist for the Global Anti-Scam Alliance (GASA), and contributes to ScamAdviser.com .

James’s mission aligns with GASA’s mission to protect consumers worldwide from scams. He is committed to empowering professionals with the insights and tools necessary to detect and mitigate online scams, ensuring the security and integrity of their operations and digital ecosystems.

Connect with James Greening on LinkedIn

Oct 17, 2024
5 minute read
Category
Best Practices Topic - Data Sharing Industry - Financial Authorities
Written by
Jorij Abraham
Managing Director
Share article

Latest blogs & research

Banking Collaboration Strengthens Fraud Prevention

A network is beaten by a network: Mexico's banks move from remediation to prevention

GASA convened the ABM Fraud Committee and Mexican banks to advance the enriched agreement and strengthen coordinated fraud prevention across the sector.

Best Practices Topic - Fraud Prevention Video Industry - Financial Authorities
La colaboración bancaria refuerza la prevención del fraude

Una red se combate con una red: la banca mexicana avanza de la remediación a la prevención

GASA reunió al Comité de Fraudes de la ABM y a bancos mexicanos para avanzar el convenio enriquecido y fortalecer la prevención coordinada del fraude.

Best Practices Topic - Fraud Prevention Video Industry - Financial Authorities
Transparency Report Fraud and Scam Findings

Appeals Centre Europe Report Points to Gaps in Social Media Scam Moderation

Appeals Centre Europe’s Transparency Report, covering April 2025 to March 2026, highlights early fraud and scam dispute findings relevant to social media moderation and scam prevention.

Research Region - Europe Topic - Scam Reporting Scam Trends
Protecting Seniors & Vulnerable Communities from Fraud

Protecting Seniors and Vulnerable Communities from Fraud

Experts from financial services, internet safety and policy explore how families, banks and communities can better protect vulnerable groups from fraud.

Industry - Telecom Operators / Hosts Topic - Fraud Prevention Topic - Scam Awareness Video
Fenasbac and GASA’s Brazil Blueprint

Fenasbac and GASA Report Outlines a Cross-Sector Response to Digital Scams in Brazil

Fenasbac and GASA’s Brazil Blueprint examines how finance, telecoms, technology and regulators can share intelligence to strengthen protection against digital scams.

Research Best Practices Industry - Telecom Operators / Hosts Topic - Data Sharing

Bitdefender Report Reveals How Scams Operate Across Digital Channels

Bitdefender’s Global Scam Intelligence Report 2026 shows how organised scam campaigns move across advertising, websites, SMS, messaging apps and voice calls to exploit trust at scale.

Research Region - Europe Topic - Fraud Prevention Region - Global
What the NDPC-Meta Initiative Means for Data Protection in Nigeria

Beyond Compliance: Why Organisational Accountability is Critical for Consumer Protection

How the NDPC-Meta initiative could strengthen data protection, organisational accountability, scam prevention and consumer trust across Nigeria’s digital economy.

Industry - National Cyber Security Centers (NCSCs) Topic - Fraud Policy Region - Africa Industry - Policy Makers

Why Mexico’s Anti-Scam Response Needs Cross-Sector Coordination

GASA Mexico Chapter's Sissi De la Pena explains why scam prevention in Mexico requires stronger coordination across finance, telecoms, platforms, government and civil society.

Best Practices Topic - Fraud Prevention Topic - Fraud Policy Industry - Financial Authorities